Geologic dating relative absolute Randomchat nude girls

16-Nov-2017 16:36

For example, wave ripples have their pointed crests on the "up" side, and more rounded troughs on the "down" side.Many other indicators are commonly present, including ones that can even tell you the angle of the depositional surface at the time ("geopetal structures"), "assuming" that gravity was "down" at the time, which isn't much of an assumption :-).I thought it would be useful to present an example where the geology is simple, and unsurprisingly, the method does work well, to show the quality of data that would have to be invalidated before a major revision of the geologic time scale could be accepted by conventional scientists.Geochronologists do not claim that radiometric dating is foolproof (no scientific method is), but it does work reliably for most samples.In this situation, the cave contents are younger than both the bedrock below the cave and the suspended roof above.However, note that because of the "principle of cross-cutting relationships", careful examination of the contact between the cave infill and the surrounding rock will reveal the true relative age relationships, as will the "principle of inclusion" if fragments of the surrounding rock are found within the infill.Cave deposits also often have distinctive structures of their own (e.g., spelothems like stalactites and stalagmites), so it is not likely that someone could mistake them for a successional sequence of rock units. Each of them is a testable hypothesis about the relationships between rock units and their characteristics.

Much of the Earth's geology consists of successional layers of different rock types, piled one on top of another.

To get to that point, there is also a historical discussion and description of non-radiometric dating methods.

Bottom line: a dating profile—your first impression—is “sell copy,” and you’re the product being marketed.… continue reading »

Read more